|
|
CATEGORY |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Originality |
Presentation
shows considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are
presented in a unique and interesting way. |
Presentation
shows some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented
in an interesting way. |
Presentation
shows an attempt at originality and inventiveness on 1-2 cards. |
Presentation
is a rehash of other people's ideas and/or graphics and shows very little
attempt at original thought. |
|
Text - Font Choice & Formatting |
Font
formats (e.g., color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance
readability and content. |
Font
formats have been carefully planned to enhance readability. |
Font
formating has been carefully planned to complement
the content. It may be a little hard to read. |
Font
formatting makes it very difficult to read the material. |
|
Content - Accuracy |
All
content throughout the presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors.
|
Most
of the content is accurate but there is one piece of information that might
be inaccurate. |
The
content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed
or inaccurate. |
Content
is typically confusing or contains more than one factual error. |
|
Sequencing of Information |
Information
is organized in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type of
material that might be on the next card. |
Most
information is organized in a clear, logical way. One card or item of
information seems out of place. |
Some
information is logically sequenced. An occassional
card or item of information seems out of place. |
There
is no clear plan for the organization of information. |
|
Cooperation |
Group
delegates tasks and shares responsibility effectively all of the time. |
Group
delegates tasks and shares responsibility effectively most of the time. |
Group
delegates tasks and shares responsibility effectively some of the time. |
Group
often is not effective in delegating tasks and/or sharing responsibility. |
|
Use of Graphics |
All
graphics are attractive (size and colors) and support the theme/content of
the presentation. |
A
few graphics are not attractive but all support the theme/content of the
presentation. |
All
graphics are attractive but a few do not seem to support the theme/content of
the presentation. |
Several
graphics are unattractive AND detract from the content of the presentation. |
|
Background |
Background
does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is
consistent from card to card and is appropriate for the topic. |
Background
does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is
consistent from card to card. |
Background
does not detract from text or other graphics. |
Background
makes it difficult to see text or competes with other graphics on the page. |
|
Information Shared |
Project
includes all material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the
topic. It is a highly effective study guide. |
Project
includes most material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the
material but is lacking one or two key elements. It is an adequate study
guide. |
Project
is missing more than two key elements. It would make an incomplete study guide.
|
Project
is lacking several key elements and has inaccuracies that make it a poor
study guide. |
|
Spelling and Grammar |
Presentation
has no misspellings or grammatical errors. |
Presentation
has 1-2 misspellings, but no grammatical errors. |
Presentation
has 1-2 grammatical errors but no misspellings. |
Presentation
has more than 2 grammatical and/or spelling errors. |